"argumentative evidence" "that's not evidence" I would say it could be. In a court case you get direct and indirect evidence. Direct evidence is eye witness testimony. Indirect evidence is other things like DNA evidence, fingerprints etc But just finding fingerprints is not going to be as strong as putting it in an argument form to explain why the fingerprints prove something. There is lots of evidence for a creator and putting it in an argument form makes the evidence even stronger. "neither of those videos provided repeatable, peer reviewable, testable evidence that the proposition "a god that can create universes - created our universe"" Does not have to. Not everything we know comes from repeatable, peer reviewable, testable evidence. For example we know you exist. Where are all the peer reviewable papers of your existence. If someone did not want to believe you exist then they would claim you are just a computer program writing comments to waste peoples' time. "Logic only goes so far. It can't be used to prove everything, we didn't get knowledge of the dinosaurs from pure logic, it was finding physical evidence." Without logic and philosophy the evidence would mean nothing. That is why a PhD stand for a Doctor of Philosophy. Without logic and philosophy you cannot do science. Science comes from the lattin word scientia which simply means knowledge. That is why you get things like Library science, a Political science and so forth. "If something manifests in our reality it should detectable by us." Yeah, but just like we cannot see a black hole, but only see the effect the black hole has on other objects. The same and even more can be seen with God. God has an effect on things just like black holes have an effect on things, but God does not just stay away from His creation. He multiple times come to His creation. I can show you lots of evidence for that. "Theists love using these bs ways to prove their god yet once you take a peek in their church you see none of those same proofs." Your huge biases seem to blind you so that you do not see the clear evidence staring you in the face. Just like flat earthers are blinded by their huge biases and thus cannot see the evidence staring them in the face. They would probably say the same kind of thing you say, but just in regard to people that try and provide evidence for a round earth.

@Topdawg Shadic "Just because I try to be an honest rational human being, doesn't mean I can't lie sometimes." So how many times have you lied and how many times does someone have to lie before they become a known liar? "If you think those videos show you that a god is obvious, then you must be easily fooled in almost anything." It's easy to just make a sweeping statement like this without backing it up with arguments. So show me where you disagree with the video or logic in the video or give me counter arguments? "Where is the real-life good evidence?" That was argumentative evidence I provided and there is much more evidence for God than that. That is just a starter for you. So where do you disagree with the argumentative evidence?

@Topdawg Shadic "When have I said I lied many times to you?" Where did I say you had? I'm just asking how many times you have lied in your life? "Why do you care what Richard Dawkins says, because I don't?" He is an atheist that many other atheists agree with and even I would agree with his words there if there was actually no God, because then he would be correct. Then there would be no evil. Not even demons would be evil then, because then they can do what they want. There would be no objective rules. "First, Theists has to establish that their god/intelligent designer exists outside their mind & not a fictional character." I think it's just obvious that there must be a creator/God. If you find yourself in any universe or world and you blindly choose the option that it was created then you would be right most of the time. Here are logical proof that beginning to find yourself in any world you would more likely be in a created world: https://youtu.be/SYAG9dAfy8U https://youtu.be/-jxdIt2_WI0

"For me, Theism is only rational for the people that have mental problems" haha hectic haha Most scientists are all theistic and almost all of the greatest scientists of the past were theists. Most Nobel prize winners are also all theistic. Even you were a theist one time in your life. So do all of those people including you have mental problems? "It is hard to be an honest rational human being for most people." You claim you are a honest rational human being then tell me how many times you have lied in your life? and how many times has your rational brain been wrong in the past? "like they think they would want to do bad things if they don't have a god (in their mind) to punish them." There are no "bad" or evil things if there is no God. If there was no God then Richard Dawkins would be right when he says: "The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.“ But because there is a God there is real design, real purpose, real evil and real good.